《上一篇 ▲ 回目錄 ▲ 下一篇》
Contact Report 843／第843次接觸報告
- 本篇譯文基於｢德｣→｢英｣→｢中｣ 而部分也嘗試直接以｢德｣→｢中｣ 譯製。
資料來源：Future Of Mankind
英版譯者：DeepL Translator, Joseph Darmanin
中版譯者：ChatGPT, DeepL Translator, James Hsu
This is the entire contact report. It is an authorised but unofficial DeepL preliminary English translation and most probably contains errors. Please note that all errors and mistakes etc. will continuously be corrected, depending on the available time of the involved persons (as contracted with Billy/FIGU). Therefore, do not copy-paste and publish this version elsewhere, because any improvement and correction will occur HERE in this version!
This is good that you have come here early in the morning, greetings and welcome. It’s good to see you, as I can also bring up some things that need to be said.
Thank you for welcoming us, however, be greeted also, though I want to ask why is it good that we come here already at this hour?
Because I am not here in the afternoon and you could not meet me. The date is just fixed because I have to have another injection in my eye because it is affected by ‘cataract’. Previously I had to have an injection in my eye every 2 months.
We did not know then.
It’s not like it’s that important that we have to talk about it. It just is and that’s that.
You say that, but diseases of the eyes are really not harmless, so also with us. But you don’t seem to want to discuss that, so I would like to talk about something else: You have told Sfath several times that you were beaten by your teacher at school because you reported at that time what you experienced and learned as a result of travelling with Sfath. Do you want to tell us what took place then?
You are right, but if you want me to tell you something from my school days, I don’t think that is so important after all, because actually it should be enough if you have been informed by Sfath or know from his annals what happened.
Nevertheless – we would like to hear from you yourself what has transpired.
儘管如此 —— 我們還是想聽聽你自己說說當時發生了什麼。
Is that what you really want?
– – Good. – Then so be it. – So then – I was in the fourth grade with teacher Frei, and he didn’t like me, so he was always looking for a reason to ‘punish’ me. So he beat me up several times in front of the whole class with his blackthorn gag, so that I could hardly walk, this was because I had said several times in the natural history lessons what I knew about the Earth’s past, but I concealed the fact that I had been to the past with Sfath and had seen and experienced everything myself and therefore knew what really was. For example, I once said that several hundred million years ago the Sahara Desert had been a huge sea and that the first living creatures on Earth had also developed there, namely on the shores and waters, as had also happened elsewhere on Earth. Moreover, the first giant creatures were not dinosaurs, but land-water creatures that lived both in the water and on the land, as is still the case today with hippos. The wild creatures of today were very small compared to those that lived in former times – as I actually saw with my own eyes – and the largest ones of that time that I could also see were, if I remember correctly, over 26 metres long, as Sfath said. Only many millions of years later came the dinosaurs, the sauropods, which were even bigger, in length as well as in height and thickness, and completely different from the creatures hundreds of millions of years before, which were long and slender. Sfath measured some of the sauropods, although I no longer know the size, but they were huge. But what I saw and experienced back then, I have never forgotten.
那好。就說說吧。那是我在四年級時在Frei老師的班上，他不喜歡我，所以他總是找理由來“修理”我。因此他當著全班同學的面，用他的黑色樺木（blackthorn）棍子打了我好幾次，甚至讓我幾乎無法走路，這是因為我在自然科學課上多次說出我對地球歷史的認識，但我沒有透露我曾經和Sfath一起穿梭到過去的時代，並親眼看到和經歷過這一切，因此我知道什麼才是真實的情形。例如，我曾經說過，幾億年前，撒哈拉沙漠（Sahara Desert）曾是一個巨大的海洋，並且在那裡發展出地球上的第一批生物，就像地球的其他地方一樣。此外，第一批巨大的生物不是恐龍，而是在水陸兩栖的生物，就像河馬一樣，在水中和陸地上生活。雖然現在的野生動物比以前的要小得多 —— 我真的親眼看到了 —— 而那個時代最大的動物，我也看到過，如果我沒記錯的話，有超過26公尺長，就像Sfath所說的那樣。幾百萬年後才出現了恐龍，如蜥腳類（sauropods）恐龍，牠們更大，無論是在長度、高度和重量上，與數億年前的細長生物完全不同。Sfath還測量了一些蜥腳類恐龍，但我已經不記得具體的尺寸了，但它們非常巨大。但那時發生的一切，我所見所聞，我永遠不會忘記。
Then, about 55 million years ago or so, the giant sea disappeared, dried up and became a desert, the one we call the Sahara today. There also followed a very long ice age, as well as a time when large jungles overgrew everything, as well as life-forms developed, from which the first human beings developed in the course of millions of years through evolution, as was the case, for example, in the Messel Pit in Germany, where Sfath and I found those skeletons of beings that were about 45 million years old and from which, as Sfath explained, the very first beings emerged about 10 or 12 million years ago, which I will call primeval humans. Then, in the course of millions of years later, the animals and the creatures and other living beings changed into pure water dwellers, whereby their legs also atrophied and fins were formed in various genera and species. Very distant descendants of these giants and colossi live today as whales in all the Earth’s oceans, just as their earliest ancestors were also widespread throughout the Earth. And that everything really was different from today – even the continents and islands – I saw just as well as that the surfaces of the Earth really did change and change, and just as nations arose and disappeared again. And I also knew through Sfath’s explanations that the change of nature cannot be stopped even in the present time, to which Earth’s humanity will contribute a great deal; I was always aware of that. And when I said and tried to explain to teacher Frei at school during natural history that everything was different from what the researchers would say in the future, the normally irascible teacher became so angry that he beat me up in front of the whole class. But he was not well disposed towards me in other ways either, as he constantly harassed me, which was because I didn’t want to have anything to do with religion and therefore regularly skipped religious instruction, which is why I was never confirmed. This was despite the fact that Pastor Zimmermann was, so to speak, good friends with my parents and confirmed all my sisters and brothers, who were Protestants and lived at Hintergasse 1253 in Niederflachs/Bülach at the time. Pastor Zimmermann was on my side, consequently he also never harassed me, but on the contrary helped me a lot. Well, in that nature lesson at school I said something about what I knew, but not that I had seen and experienced everything with Sfath myself. So what I explained was what I knew because I had travelled around with Sfath in the past and had seen and experienced everything myself. And because I said what I saw and knew, I was beaten up for it, and that taught me that I never said anything about it to anyone again and kept quiet from then on. It is also wrong to say anything about it publicly today, because on the one hand the whole thing is probably not understood, and on the other hand antagonists are sure to appear on the scene immediately and accuse me of lying and deception or simply of fantasy, etc. This is also done with regard to contacts. This is also done with regard to the contacts with you Plejaren, even though there were and still are witnesses to these contacts.
然後，大約在五千五百萬年前左右，這個巨大的海洋消失了，乾涸成了沙漠，就是我們今天所稱的撒哈拉沙漠。隨後還出現了一個非常漫長的的冰河時代，以及一個大叢林覆蓋所有地方的時期，各種生命形式也在這段時間內發展出來，經過漫長的進化，成為了最早的人類。例如在德國的梅塞爾坑（Messel Pit），Sfath和我發現了那些大約四千五百萬年前的生物的骨骼，Sfath解釋說，這些生物在大約一千萬到一千兩百萬年前進化成了最早的人類。然後，在數百萬年後的過程中，動物、昆蟲和其他生物轉變成了純粹的水棲生物，其腿部萎縮，各種品種和物種的鰭開始形成。這些巨獸的遠房後代，今天以鯨魚的形式生活在地球的所有海洋中，它們的早期祖先也被遍佈全球。我看到一切都與今天大不相同 —— 甚至包括大陸和島嶼 —— 我也看到地球表面確實發生了變化和改變，也包括民族的興起和消失。通過Sfath的解釋，我也知道，即使在現在，自然界的變化也是無法阻止的，地球人類也會對此有很大的貢獻，這一點我一直都很清楚。當我在自然科學課上告訴Frei老師，一切都與研究人員未來的說法不同時，這位平時脾氣暴躁的老師變得非常生氣，當著全班同學的面打了我一頓。但他在其他方面也對我不懷好意，因為他經常欺負我，這是因為我不想涉及宗教，並且經常逃避宗教課程，這也是我從未受洗的原因。儘管齊默爾曼（Zimmermann）牧師可以說是我父母的好朋友，並為我所有的姐妹和兄弟（他們都是當時住在Niederflachs/Bülach的Hintergasse 1253號的新教徒）進行受洗禮。齊默爾曼牧師站在我這邊，因此他也從來沒有騷擾過我，反而還幫了我很多。好吧，在學校的自然課上，我所說的是我所知道的，因為我曾與Sfath一起穿梭到過去，並親眼目睹和體驗了一切。但因為我講了我所看到和所知道的事情，所以被打了。這教會了我永遠不會再向任何人講這些話，因此從那時起就保持沉默。即使今天公開說這些話可能也是不對的，因為一方面整個事情可能不被理解，另一方面反對者肯定會立即出現在現場，指控我說謊和欺騙，或者只是幻想等等。在與你們Plejaren的接觸方面也是如此，即使有證人證明瞭這些接觸的存在，但仍然有人質疑其真實性。
We know that, and we also know of your past, for as Juraata and I explained to you on our last visit, our peoples were constantly informed of what transpired with you and Sfath, as well as of what you spoke together. What we never gained knowledge of, however, was what you personally experienced, learned and experienced. It was us …
… I am sure that’s not important either.
It is certainly very interesting to us, though, because just what we hear from Ptaah when he talks about what you …
… that is quite adventurous. Juraata and I would be very interested if you would tell us some things in private. We, Juraata and I, also decided to ask you if we could also visit you about that when we are back on Erra, to talk to you about what your experiences were that happened privately.
Yes, that would be our wish.
– What would you like me to say about that? – It – yes, actually there is nothing to escape, but you have to consider that I am not the youngest anymore. I am not as old as you are, but…
你們想讓我對此說些什麼呢？它 —— 是的，實際上沒有什麼好逃避的，但你們必須考慮到我已經不再年輕了。我雖不像你們那麼老，但 …
… we are younger than you, because we know your effective age, whereas I therefore know that according to earthly calculation I will only be the same age in 14 years as you are at present. And Juraata …
… 我們比你年輕，因為我們知道你的實際年齡，而我因此知道，根據地球上的計算方式，我在14年後將與你現在的年齡相同。而Juraata …
… let it be, for in 17 years I shall be of your age, if, like Jjfa, I contract the appellation of time, as the usage of language applies in this world. But something else: We have observed that far up north in a city, persons sat down on the ground and got stuck on the streets by their hands, which, however, security organs then laboriously detached again. Why is this being done, it is nonsensical?
These are lunatics who think that by doing this they can force governments to do what these sticky idiots demand and want to force them to do, which is to change the world with regard to the tremendous pollution and other destruction that is being caused on Earth and thereby endangering all life. But these people who want to change everything in the process you have seen – but as a rule it is others who should do it, not they themselves – in order to put an end to all the pollution and destruction, but that they themselves pollute and damage and destroy everything with their actions, these people cannot think that far, because they are as stupid as bean straw, because stupidity is nothing other than a non-thinking and therefore not a brain disease.
這些瘋子相信他們可以通過這種方式迫使政府去做他們所要求並強制執行的事情，也就是改變世界上正在造成的巨大污染和其他破壞，這些問題對地球上的一切生命都構成了威脅。但是，這些人想在你所看到的過程中改變一切 —— 但通常是別人去做，而不是他們自己 —— 為了結束所有的污染和破壞，但事實上，他們自己的行為卻造成了污染、傷害和破壞，這些人並沒有想到如此遠，因為他們像豆莢一樣愚蠢，因為愚蠢什麼也不是，只是不思考，因此也不是一種腦部疾病。
These people are demonstrators who pretend to be environmentalists, but in reality cause more damage and destruction than they achieve with their mad actions. These demonstrators are so addicted to stupidity resp. non-thinking that they cannot recognise the truth and thus cannot see that the whole evil of all destructions of nature, the climate, the waters, the forests, the fields, meadows, moors, swamps, mountains and the seas etc. can be rampant solely due to the machinations of exuberant overpopulation. This is what we call stupidity, stupidity, foolish or silly etc., which results from a non-thinking and from which human beings are afflicted who are somehow ‘feeble-minded’ in the process that, on the one hand, they cannot think for themselves, but are only worldly believers – like religious delusionists – consequently they believingly make their ‘personal opinion’ what other persons indoctrinate them with as reality, which they then believe and act confusedly according to. The expression ‘stupidity’ in its linguistic development meant, among other things, that the human being suffers from various behavioural defects, consequently also from stupidity, which is based on nothing other than the lack of independent and conscious clear and sensible thinking. The human being who does not do this, however, and thus gives himself over to non-thinking or illusory thinking, does so because he suffers, for example, from clumsiness or timidity, and this is now equated with stupidity. The use of this term is unfortunately taken in a disparaging and insulting way with regard to the characterisation of a human being, although it only describes the existing facts of the weaknesses of the mind. These are based, for example, also in the lack of clarity of ideas, as well as in the confusion of illusory thinking. In everything there is also a lack of self-confidence, which makes a normal contact with the environment and fellow human beings impossible, because somehow fearfulness and even timidity block everything, so also through behaviour against custom, because the lack of ethics and morals violates all rules. The weakness and the lack of the ability to judge a matter for oneself, instead of simply believing what is pretended and indoctrinated, is due to the lack of self-confidence and timidity in dealing with fellow human beings.
As a rule, such human beings are indolent, timid, physically weak and timid, ignorant, incapable of life. or suffer from dilettantism and ignorance concerning reality and its truth. And when they speak of stupidity and stupidity, then ‘stupid’ means that the human being imagines that he is not stupid, resp. he imagines that he thinks, while in reality he is only subject to an illusory thinking that never allows reality and its truth to be recognised. This illusory thinking is as banausic as the human beings in question themselves, who are somehow primitive and uncultured and also ‘chavvy’ resp. redneckish and want to attract attention by actions that fall outside the norm of decency, order, reason and what is normal and correct.
But I was talking about something else before. In this respect, it should be said that the Earth is designed to feed 500 to 530 million human beings in true abundance and to enable them to live without great problems. But the earthling wants to be cleverer in his delusion that he can endlessly subjugate and destroy the whole of nature. Consequently, he drives his population endlessly upwards and has already raised it 19 times above what the Earth is able to cope with without damage.
The earthling has oriented everything towards destruction instead of progress, and he believes that through the development and coming of artificial intelligence everything will be better, but this will be the opposite. And this will happen in such a way that he, the earthling, will bring himself to the brink of extinction, just as he is exterminating the wild creatures, of which about 150 genera or species are eliminated daily, that is, about 55,000 per year. But the idiotic protesters do not see and recognise this, because they do not realise that it is they themselves who are causing all the pollution and destruction to continue and to increase inexorably, because it is they, these protesters, who are doing everything to make it worse and worse. This is because it is they themselves, these very demonstrators, who are producing and bringing into the world offspring, who in turn need all the means of life, which have to be produced again in this and that way, so that the entire ecosystems of the Earth are burdened and destroyed even more and more. This is one reason why pollution, CO2 production, air pollution, plastic pollution in nature and in the waters, waste pollution of every kind and every other devastating evil of pollution and destruction continues irresponsibly.
But pollution, the destruction of nature and all ecosystems, flora and also the extermination of wild animals, wildlife and otherwise all wild life, is not solely based on the aforementioned monstrosity of air and environmental pollution and all destruction as perpetrated by the idiotic, irresponsible and stupidly impudent protesters as well as alleged ‘environmentalists’ themselves. They do this by producing and giving birth to more and more offspring, which in turn need everything that has to be produced and generated in order to live and exist, which promotes even more and ever faster environmental pollution, destroys the atmosphere, destroys the atmosphere, drives the extinction of all wild life, poisons the waters, and builds up the fertile and precious land with roads, sports fields, airfields, railways, factories, cinemas and opera houses, with houses of worship and temples, as well as with factories, residential buildings, administrative buildings and apartment blocks, etc. built up. But they are unable to grasp with their sick skulls that this is forced upon them by the irrational creation of offspring by human beings, and above all by the non-thinking, stupid and impudent demonstrators who also cause destruction and often serious damage, and that it is even necessary due to their imbecility of non-thinking and non-understanding. With their stupidity and audacity, these lying, deceitful, stubborn, destructive, hypocritical show demonstrators are at the forefront of all irrationality, lack of understanding and illogic, because in reality they are doing the exact opposite of what they are supposedly denouncing. They do this by producing and giving birth to offspring and more offspring, which by their very existence increase environmental pollution even more, just as their existence also contributes in every respect to all other evils destroying the world resp. the planet and thus all ecosystems, the whole of nature with all its fauna and flora. And when the atmosphere also collapses and the climate finally collapses, then ‘Matthäi is at the last’, because then hardly anything can be saved from ruin.
但是環境污染、自然破壞以及所有生態系統、植物群落的破壞以及野生動物的滅絕，野生動物和其他野生動物的滅絕，不僅僅是因為通過愚蠢、不負責任和愚蠢的示威者和所謂的“環保主義者”所犯的空氣和環境污染以及所有破壞的不良行為所造成的。這是因為他們仍然大量地繁殖後代，這些後代需要一切生存和存在的必需品，進而更快地促進環境污染、破壞大氣層、推動所有野生生物的滅絕、毒害水域和用運動場、機場、鐵路、工廠、電影院、歌劇院、宗教建築、住宅、行政樓、公寓大廈等建築填滿了寶貴的土地。然而，人類沒有理性地不斷生育後代，尤其是由於那些毀滅性、造成嚴重破壞的遊行示威者，他們的愚蠢和毀滅行為迫使這一切發生，而這些遊行示威者的腦袋病態無法理解這一點。這些精神病、撒謊、欺騙、不合作、破壞和偽善的示威者以其愚蠢和傲慢居於所有不理智、不理解和不合邏輯的行列之首，因為事實上，他們私下所做的與他們所謂抗議的完全相反。他們通過生育後代，不斷增加的人口數量，使環境污染進一步加劇，他們的存在對其他所有問題都有貢獻，破壞了地球上的所有生態系統、整個自然界的動植物。當大氣層崩潰，氣候最終崩潰時，確實是“末日將至”（Matthäi is at the last），因為那時幾乎沒有什麼能挽救崩潰的命運。
Well, the environmental pollution and the destruction of all ecosystems of planet Earth, of the whole of nature, its fauna and flora, of the atmosphere and the climate, is not happening as a result of what I have mentioned so far. Fundamentally, everything goes much further and concerns human beings in general, so also the loud-mouthed demonstrators, who are just as guilty of all the destruction, pollution, poisoning of the world, of the ecosystems and of all the extinction of wild life, as the absolute majority of the earth’s population in general. This can already begin with the use of chemical agents of all kinds to care for the body, to wash the hands or the hair with chemical soaps or other similar agents, because these settle in the waste water, namely as chemical residues of the chemical substances with which the agents in question are impregnated. This also happens with all chemical fragrances that are on the market as room air fresheners and whose substances are deposited on the objects in the room and get into the waste water when the objects in question are cleaned and washed with water. The same happens with toilet fragrance stones and other fragrance sprays, etc., because all products resp. chemical agents of any kind, regardless of whether they are used for body cleaning, direct or indirect body care, will sooner or later deposit residues. This also happens with chemical agents that are used for washing clothes, for laundry in general, as cleaning agents for eating utensils or anything else. So also cleaning agents for floors, walls and other things of any kind, as well as detergents used for cars, motorbikes or anything else, are very harmful to the environment and end up as chemical residues in the waste water. This, however, is very alarming and harmful to the health of human beings, animals, creatures and all life-forms. This is because the chemically contaminated wastewater enters the sewers and sewage treatment plants, where it is of course not removed by the waste filtration systems, but continues to enter public waters and, moreover, inevitably enters the drinking water. As a result, countless human beings fall ill and languish with a wide variety of ailments, not infrequently bedridden for years, in wheelchairs and in pain, before they die.
Many human beings – and this is becoming more and more frequent – fall ill with cancer because the chemical residues in the drinking water cannot be broken down by their immune system, but paralyse it and put it out of action. This not only leaves human beings unprotected and susceptible to many different diseases, but also effectively infects them. Added to this are the residues of pesticides and other chemicals that are often present in food, of which consumers usually have no idea, let alone knowledge. In particular, it is food of an industrial kind, but especially vegetables and meat of all kinds, whereby organic products are also not immune to pollutants. Especially in black and green tea, as well as in various other organic products, potentially carcinogenic substances can be found, such as heavy oil, moulds, heavy metals and anthraquinones and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Organic sunflower oil, for example, may contain critical mineral oils, although pesticides are largely taboo in organic goods. However, this does not hide the fact that organic products may contain several active ingredients of multiple residues of chemical substances that can have a harmful effect on the human body. Besides, it is not yet clear on Earth how high the pesticide limit is that does not immediately become life-threatening for human beings. In any case, the fact is, and this is quite different from what the organic fanatics assume, that organic products also have problems with pollutants, but these mostly get into the organic products through the working processes in the form of impurities.
What should be done now, however – what especially the idiotic protesters should do in the first place, such as the particularly sick-stupid-dumb characters who call themselves ‘Last Generation’ and cause a thousand times more damage than they can achieve success with their idiotic actions – is that they should immediately and without pardon use contraceptives to prevent pregnancies and thus births of offspring. In this regard, I said during our last conversation that Sfath had already mentioned – it was the mid-1940s – that one day governments would become more clever, that they would give such contraceptives free of charge on their own initiative, but that I had neither read nor heard anything about it so far. Bernadette then investigated the matter on her own and found that some governments on Earth had become wise and were giving birth control pills free of charge. The list she compiled in this regard is this one (note: the list was found at http://www.fernarzt.com/wissen/studien/antibabypille-in-europa and supplemented with Italy due to the current resolution):
這裡所需要做的事情 —— 尤其是那些愚蠢的示威者們，例如自稱“最後一代”的那些特別病態、愚蠢、愚蠢的人們 —— 他們應該立即且毫不猶豫地使用避孕措施，以防止懷孕和新生兒的出生。在這方面，我們在上次會面談話中說，Sfath已經提到 —— 那是1940年代中期 —— 有一天政府會變得更加明智，他們會主動免費提供這種避孕藥物，但我至今沒有讀到或聽到任何這方面的消息。Bernadette自己進行了調查，發現地球上的有些政府變得更明智了，免費提供了避孕藥。她在這方面整理的名單是這樣的（注：該清單可在www.fernarzt.com/wissen/studien/antibabypille-in-europa上找到，並根據最新的決定，補充了義大利）。
This is, I would like to say, a step forward of reason to start in an exemplary way to reduce the really blatant and all-destroying overpopulation, which, however, has to be done much more drastically than just with the anti-baby pill. Politics in general, mainly the actual rulers themselves, would have to make the world population aware of the fact that it generally has to match the fact that no or at least as few as possible offspring are conceived and created, so that the overpopulation is brought under a stock of one million human beings. Only by this, and because the planet and thus its resources, like the Earth itself with all its ecosystems, nature and its fauna and flora, is designed for a humanity that is only slightly more than 500,000,000 resp. half a billion human beings with everything they need in every respect to live, to exist and for their entire evolution, politics in general and the main rulers should be particularly concerned that a worldwide and very precise authoritative birth control is established, then also exercised and adhered to, as well as really and effectively enforced. Only in this way can all the problems of environmental pollution, all the destruction of ecosystems, the destruction of nature, its fauna and flora, also of the atmosphere and ultimately even the total destruction of the world resp. the destruction of the planet be counteracted and these problems can be ended. Bernadette has given me another article entitled ‘PREGNANCY AND LACTATION – CUMULATIVE REVIEW’ (Note: An article concerning the consequences of COVID-19 vaccinations in pregnant women), which is interesting in itself, but which I will append at the end of the interview report, but which you can copy here and then read later.
However, the fact that Earth’s humanity is being ‘dismantled’ by a birth stop is one of the necessary measures to still prevent the general evil and the total destruction of the Earth, just as thus also the complete destruction of ecosystems and the final destruction of nature, its fauna and flora and the atmosphere of the planet is to be thwarted and ended before it is too late and nothing more can be done.
As has been said, not only a drastic prevention of pregnancy and thus a radical and long-lasting as well as state-controlled birth stop is the one and most important course of action against all destruction and annihilation of the Earth and its diverse life, for a second course of action is still necessary, and this is based on the fact that no means of any kind whatsoever are bought and used any more, which are produced on the basis of chemicals. This applies to all kinds of cleaning agents of all kinds, perfumes, fertilisers and pesticides, insect repellents, insecticides, body cleansers, pesticides of all kinds, plant protection products, toothpastes, soaps, lipsticks and detergents for clothes and laundry, as well as for cars, motorbikes and machines of all kinds and other things etc., whereby the enumeration of the individual products would fill whole books.
But we must also not forget those foodstuffs which contain small or large amounts of chemicals and which should not be eaten by human beings anyway and should also not be given to animals and creatures etc. as food. Everything chemical is harmful to the health of human beings, as well as to all living beings in general, which is why every human being should act absolutely and strictly to ensure that no chemical agents are used for any purpose whatsoever, or that chemical-containing foodstuffs are used in any process whatsoever, not even for animals, creatures, fish, birds, ferrets, chickens and fowls or other poultry, etc., as well as for rabbits, cats and dogs, cows, horses, goats, pigs, sheep and numerous other living beings of all genera and species. The worst are the pesticides which are used in many thousands of tons by agriculture and all the vegetable growing as well as the market gardens and very many private persons in their horticulture etc., whereby extremely much of the poisonous chemistry is absorbed by the diverse vegetables, as well as by the teas and herbs and mushrooms etc. and these are thus contaminated with poison. This ‘stuff’, however, is accepted and eaten by the earthling without hesitation as ‘natural’ food, and he becomes miserably ill through the poisons contained in it and thus languishes through his life. In many cases, these foods cause cancer, precisely because of the chemical poisons they contain.
The crime that politicians, government officials, chemists, chemical companies and other irresponsible people commit is based on the fact that they unhesitatingly specify and allow minimum levels of chemical toxins that may be contained in any kind of food. This is despite the fact that even the smallest and infinitesimally small amounts of chemicals resp. toxins are at least slightly pathogenic for human beings, or, depending on the case, can cause the most severe forms of illness or even be fatal. But nobody cares about that, neither the politicians, the rulers nor the populations, not even when they become ill from the minimal toxins in the food, because every illness of any kind is automatically attributed to other causes, although the actual reason is the toxins in the food. And the more such food from the poison-using farms, other food producers like food corporations, market gardens and from private persons etc. is eaten without any hesitation, the worse everything becomes with the rampaging of health. But the human beings believe the lies and all the deceit that is lied about ‘healthy food’ etc., as is also the case with vaccinations against the Corona rampantly spreading disease, which is claimed to be untrue and which is denied to have caused countless deaths or lifelong suffering through the untested vaccines. This means that Switzerland is also in deep trouble, as it was openly claimed on television by well-known disease control officials that there were no Corona vaccine deaths in Switzerland – ‘maybe’ 19 cases, as it was not known exactly why the persons in question had died. It is simply a case of lying and cheating to the hilt.
However, as far as the written text is concerned, which Michael downloaded onto my computer as films and which I let you watch, this has been read in Austria and recorded in writing, so that I now have it here and you can copy it.
However, overall this is only a very small part of what is really going on in the background and everything is kept secret from the public, because in reality the whole thing is completely different from what is being released by those who are at the helm in every way, whereby I am thereby considering those in power as well as the scientists of electronic technology, nanotechnology and biology etc. Already these are generally very much further along in every form of development than is publicly made known, for work is already being done underground with steps being taken to …, which, however, I shall only tell you and not call it openly, as Sfath has already told me that I should …
整體而言，這裡只是背後真正運作的一小部分，一切都對公眾保密，因為實際上一切都與那些掌權的人所公開的完全不同。我指的是統治者以及電子技術、奈米科技（nanotechnology）和生物學等領域的科學家們。他們在各種發展方面已經走得比公開宣佈的更先進，因為在幕後已經開始以採取行動到 … 程度，不過Sfath告訴我，我只應該告訴你們 …，而不是公開說出來。
Which would also not be good, which is why you are wisely keeping quiet about it.
That’s what I also think, and besides, I’m following Sfath’s advice. What I can say, however, is that nanotechnology is already so advanced that what are generally called insects, but in reality are e.g. beetles, bees, wasps, moths and other creatures, as well as mice, rats, cats, dogs and rabbits, etc., and creepers and aquatic creatures of many genera and species, such as octopods and fish, etc., are imitated. Also, drones and bombers for murder and destruction, for example, have not been controlled in war zones for years, but in America, and it doesn’t matter whether they are used to murder and destroy in Afghanistan or Ukraine, for example. In this way, America participates in all the murder and destruction, but it is not directly present on the spot with its military, because insidiously everything is controlled remotely in America. In this way, America can always claim that it is not involved in the war etc. – because it is not directly present.
This is the work that Harald has read and produced. So this is a written record of the texts of the films you have seen. This is a presentation by Martin Wehrle, Germany’s best-known career consultant (FOCUS), winner of the Coaching Award and founder of the 365-Day Challenge. The text of his film lecture lasts – as you have heard for yourselves – a good 30 minutes. The written expression is now the following:
00:00:00:10 – 00:00:27:03
No matter what you think about the war in Ukraine so far. After this video you will see it with new eyes, because you will be given the proof of how this war really came about. And I will tell you who is doing everything behind the scenes to drag out this war. It is outrageous, of all people, those who lit the fuse of the Ukraine war with their own hands, they are now expressing outrage at this bang.
00:00:27:13 – 00:00:51:06
The scandal that I am proving to you here with reputable sources is staggering. I will tell you in a moment to which insider I owe this confidential material. My name is Martin Berner. I am the author of the book ‘Den Netten beissen die Hunde’ and founder of 365 Days, which accompanies you through every day of your year.
00:00:51:16 – 00:01:18:13
Firstly, I will tell you who is artificially prolonging this war and for what reasons. Secondly, I will tell you explosive details about how great the danger of nuclear war really is. After all, there are confidential documents. And thirdly, in the main part you will learn which five fatal provocations have provoked the war in Ukraine. And fourthly, at the end I will tell you my opinion about who is responsible for this great crisis.
00:01:19:03 – 00:01:42:16
One thing is very important to me: Putin started this war. And that is undoubtedly a crime. And there is no excuse me for that. And whoever wages war, no matter under which flag, is my opponent. But my opponent is also anyone who provokes or prolongs a war. And these two accusations, they apply to the West, especially to the USA.
00:01:43:07 – 00:02:09:08
My evidence and quotes from this video are based on a spectacular book that has just been published. It is called ‘How the West Brought War to Ukraine’. The author is an intimate connoisseur of the US political establishment, Benjamin Abelow, a long-time expert on nuclear weapons policy. In a startlingly factual process, he reveals a background to this war that has been almost completely blanked out by the media.
我這段視頻中的證據和引用是基於一本剛剛出版的聳人聽聞的書。它叫做《西方如何把戰爭帶到烏克蘭》（How the West Brought War to Ukraine）。作者是美國政治體系的內部人士、長期從事核武器政策的專家Benjamin Abelow（暫譯為本傑明．阿比洛夫）。他以驚人的客觀方式揭示了這場戰爭的幕後背景，這在媒體上幾乎被完全忽略了。
00:02:09:23 – 00:02:43:02
First of all, the urgent question: Why has the war in Ukraine lasted so long? Why has there been no peace summit between Putin and Biden? Although the world is on the brink of nuclear war? Why is the USA apparently not interested in a ceasefire, but in continuing the war? Book author Benjamin Abelow, an intimate connoisseur of Pentagon security policy, uncovers the secret answer, the US’s first wartime objective, humanitarian aid to Ukraine.
00:02:43:12 – 00:03:19:13
That has been superseded by a second war aim. To bleed Russia militarily. Think of the war in Ukraine as a football match. The US, which defines itself as Russia’s potential next opponent, is naturally very interested in prolonging the previous game. After all, the longer the fight with Ukraine goes on, the more power the Russians lose, the more weapons they lose, and the more fighting morale they lose, and the more they will shy away from a confrontation with the US afterwards, the self-centred conclusion goes.
00:03:20:04 – 00:03:46:05
It is a cynical game. While every day of this war is devastating for Ukraine, while cities are bombed back to the Stone Age, while young soldiers are torn to shreds on the battlefield, while civilians freeze to death in unheated homes or wander the globe as refugees. So while Ukraine pays an incredibly high price for each new day of war.
00:03:46:17 – 00:04:20:08
Meanwhile, there are powerful cynics in the Pentagon who celebrate every extra day of this war as a strategic point gained against Russia. One power insider, namely Chess Freeman, ex-Secretary of State for Security Affairs at the US Department of Defense, speaks plainly about this perfidious strategy. I quote: “Everything we are doing here seems to be aimed at prolonging the fighting and supporting the Ukrainian resistance, rather than bringing about an end to the fighting and a compromise.
00:04:21:02 – 00:04:53:11
And in order to make it clear who is paying the bill, he even intensifies this statement: “We are fighting for Ukrainian independence to the last Ukrainian. Ukrainian independence to the last Ukrainian. While it would be good for Ukraine to end the war as soon as possible, it is good for the USA to continue it as long as possible, and Germany is taking part in this dirty game! But do Scholz, Baerbock and Co. even see through the fact that the supposed humanistic action has the opposite effect and satisfies a strategic interest of the USA?
00:04:54:03 – 00:05:25:03
Or do they really mean to serve peace and the human beings in Ukraine with ever new deliveries of weapons? In a moment, I will describe to you the fatal chain of provocations and wrong decisions with which the USA in particular provoked the Ukraine war instead of preventing it in advance. Above all, I would like to use the expertise of nuclear weapons policy expert Benjamin Abelow to answer a question that is of great concern to all of us these days: How close are we to nuclear war?
00:05:25:15 – 00:05:58:00
He points out several facts that I find deeply disturbing. Moscow has threatened nuclear weapons on several occasions. Three days after the war began on 27 February, Putin raised the alert level of his nuclear forces in response to – according to Putin – aggressive statements by Western politicians. In sport, that would mean: ‘ready’ was added to the command ‘on your marks’, so that only one word – the word ‘go’ – is needed for a nuclear strike.
00:05:58:08 – 00:06:24:23
And Putin’s propaganda show in May made clear what a nuclear strike might look like. On state TV he threatened Britain with a radioactive tsunami wave unleashed by a Russian nuclear torpedo. Something interesting has already happened as a result of Putin’s statement. The politicians of the West dismissed these tones from Moscow as empty threats, just as they had declared Moscow the ‘capital of bluffers’ before the Ukraine war.
00:06:25:10 – 00:06:54:02
So the media and the population were anaesthetised with verbal sedatives. But behind the scenes, things looked very different, as nuclear policy expert Benjamin Abelow writes in his book. I quote: “The US military, however, raised its alert level to DEFCON Three within 24 hours of Putin’s announcement on 27 February. The first time since the attack on the World Trade Center in 2001.
00:06:54:23 – 00:07:22:14
There is an increasing likelihood that an accident, a political miscalculation or a computer error could lead to nuclear war. I thought of these lines when the missile accident in Poland happened. We are no longer on the brink of nuclear war. We are already one step further. And now I will talk about the real causes of the war, before I also give you my personal assessment.
00:07:22:23 – 00:07:56:10
Benjamin Abelov’s core thesis is: the real cause of the war is not to be found in unbridled expansionism on Putin’s part or in paranoid delusions on the part of military strategists in the Kremlin, but in a 30-year history of Western provocations against Russia that began with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and continued until the start of the war. The first link in the chain of five fatal provocations was forged in the course of German reunification, which was only possible with the consent of the Soviet Union. It is thanks to Mikhail Gorbachev that tanks did not crush the democratic uprising in Berlin in 1989 as they did in the Prague Spring of 1968. And not only that, Gorbachev even made it possible for Germany to become one again. But why did the Soviet Union agree to German unity? Kohl injected a few billion, but that alone could not have been the reason. Why did the Soviet Union withdraw about 400,000 soldiers from the GDR?
本傑明．阿比洛夫的主要論點是：導致這場戰爭的真正原因不是普丁的狂熱擴張主義或克林姆林宮軍事策略家的偏執妄想，而是西方對俄羅斯30年來的挑釁史，從蘇聯解體開始一直持續到戰爭爆發。這條致命挑釁鏈條的第一個環節始於德國統一，這只有在蘇聯的同意下才能實現。1989年，在柏林沒有像1968年布拉格之春一樣，坦克鎮壓了民主起義，這要歸功於米哈伊爾．戈爾巴喬夫（Mikhail Gorbachev）。而且不僅如此，戈爾巴喬夫（Gorbachev；台灣譯為戈巴契夫）甚至讓德國重新統一成為可能。但是，蘇聯為什麼會同意德國統一？ Kohl提供了幾十億美元，但這本身不可能是原因。為什麼蘇聯從東德撤走了大約四十萬名士兵呢？
00:08:29:09 – 00:08:57:10
Why did it allow Germany to become a NATO country, even though the East had until then been part of the Warsaw Pact and had formed a bulwark against the West? The Soviet Union did so because Western heads of state and foreign ministers made it a plethora of security promises. Hans Dietrich Genscher, the German foreign minister, said in retrospect: ‘We agreed that there was no intention of extending the NATO defence area eastwards.
為什麼蘇聯會允許德國成為北約國家，儘管東方到那時屬於華沙公約，並形成對抗西方的屏障？蘇聯這麼做是因為西方的國家元首和外交部長做出了大量的安全承諾。德國外交部長漢斯-迪特里希．根舍（Hans Dietrich Genscher）回顧道：我們一致同意，沒有擴大北約防禦區向東擴展的意圖。
00:08:57:21 – 00:09:24:18
By the way, this is not only true with regard to the GDR, which we do not want to annex, but it is true in general. In his book, Abelow quotes a well-known professor from Boston, Joshua Shifrinson. The researcher has delved into the archives to analyse the negotiations of the time. And he comes to the conclusion: I was able to look in parallel at what was being said to the Soviets’ faces and what was being said in the backrooms in the US.
00:09:25:02 – 00:09:55:01
Many of the Russians have repeatedly claimed that the US informally agreed to non-expansion in 1990. And over the last 25 years, Western politicians, at least in the US, have said unequivocally ‘No, we haven’t’. From what I have found in the archives, it appears to me that the Russian narrative corresponds in principle exactly to the actual events. Translated, it means that the Russians were taken to the cleaners by the West.
00:09:55:10 – 00:10:26:24
They were promised that NATO would not expand further east. But from the beginning, in the back rooms, they planned not to keep it. After all, there was no formal treaty. Ouch, Ivan, you fell for it! And so Russia had to watch impotently as NATO admitted three Eastern European states in 1999: Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic. The admission of Poland was particularly worrying for the Russians, because there are traditionally great tensions between the two countries.
00:10:27:10 – 00:11:02:03
Later, in 2004, NATO brought other Eastern European countries on board, including Romania and Estonia, which borders directly on Russia. Now NATO had moved 1,500 kilometres closer to Russia. Contrary to the promises made in the course of reunification, and in 2008 NATO announced that it would accept Ukraine and Georgia as members. This is a nightmare for the Russians, as they share a border of around 2000 kilometres with Ukraine, some of which is only 600 kilometres from Moscow.
00:11:02:22 – 00:11:28:23
And now it gets really, really exciting, because the current CIA director William Burns was US ambassador to Moscow at the time. In a telegram he sounded the alarm and made it clear that the accession of Ukraine and Georgia to NATO was unacceptable to Russia. He headed his telegram with ‘Nyet means nyet’. No means no, and in our case he elaborates on which borders must not be crossed by the West.
現在變得非常非常有趣，因為現任中央情報局局長威廉．伯恩斯（William Burns）當時是美國駐莫斯科大使。他在一份電報中發出警報，明確表示烏克蘭和格魯吉亞加入北約對俄羅斯來說是無法容忍的。他在電報上標題為“Nyet means nyet”；意思就是：「不行，就是不行」，他向我們解釋了西方不能越過的界限。
00:11:30:05 – 00:12:05:01
Russia sees this not only as encirclement and an effort to undermine Russia’s influence in the region, but also fears unpredictable and uncontrollable consequences that would seriously affect Russian security interests. So the Americans knew that the Russians perceived Ukraine’s accession to NATO as an existential threat. The Americans knew that the Russians had said no and meant no and that running that red light could create a bad clash, possibly a war.
00:12:05:15 – 00:12:36:24
Yet the Americans and NATO did not stop promising Ukraine a future in NATO. I will come back to this in a moment. Years earlier, the second link had already been inserted into the chain of Western provocations, for in 2001, two years after the first Eastern countries were admitted, George W. Bush terminated the ABM Treaty limiting anti-ballistic missile defence systems. It is important to know that these systems can be used not only for defence but also for attack.
00:12:37:14 – 00:13:06:24
Please imagine you are the head of the Russian government. First you withdraw troops and agree to reunification because you are given security guarantees. Then these promises are broken one after the other. Then the enemy army moves up to your border by absorbing a neighbouring country. And finally, missiles are also limited and agreements unilaterally cancelled. You wouldn’t have to be a particularly paranoid character to smell a hostile act in that.
00:13:07:10 – 00:13:35:07
Could it be that an adversary is putting itself in an optimal position here to be able to make a quick strike against Moscow, if possible? We in the West must never forget the misfortune we brought upon the Russians in the Second World War. Some 25 million Russians were slaughtered, torn to pieces on the battlefields, cut down in mass shootings and driven to starvation by a diabolical plan of Hitler.
00:13:36:00 – 00:14:06:05
This great calamity came upon the Russians after they had relied on an agreement with Hitler, a Hitler-Stalin pact. This was the non-aggression pact of 1939. Hitler hoodwinked the Russians. His attack on the 22nd of June 1941 caught them on the wrong foot, with fatal consequences. Around 8 million Germans died in the Second World War, but 25 million Russians – 25 million.
00:14:06:20 – 00:14:32:10
You have to realise that. Although Germany had started this war and only fought it around the globe, almost three times as many Russians died as Germans. Almost all of today’s Russians, Putin included, lost family members and very close human beings in the bloodbath of the Second World War. This is unbelievable suffering that the West brought upon Russia. This was only a few decades ago now.
00:14:32:23 – 00:15:01:04
Wouldn’t it have been wise of the West to take the fear of the Russians more seriously? Would it not have been wise, after the end of the Cold War, to inspire confidence and also to keep all promises made to Russia, whether verbal or written? Would it not have been wise to continue the era of disarmament instead of ending it unilaterally? Wouldn’t all this have been wise, wouldn’t all this have been called for in order to secure world peace?
00:15:02:05 – 00:15:34:10
But it gets worse. For now I will show you the third link in the chain of Western provocations, which I will follow with my personal classification after the fifth provocation. So third provocation: the US supported – if not instigated – a far-right coup in Ukraine in late 2013, early 2014. Violent provocateurs used anti-government protests to hound the pro-Russian president out of office.
但事情還會變得更糟。現在，我會向您展示西方挑釁的第三個環節，之後我會對前五個挑釁作出我的個人評價。所以，第三個挑釁是這樣的：2013年底至2014年初，美國支持 —— 如果不是挑起了 —— 烏克蘭的極右翼政變。暴力挑釁者利用反對政府的抗議活動，趁機趕走親俄的總統。
00:15:34:23 – 00:16:11:10
The government building was stormed by far-right ultra-nationalists, with fatal consequences for Russia. In his book, John J. Mearsheimer, a professor of political science at the University of Chicago, quotes the following analysis: “The new government in Kiev was thoroughly pro-Western and anti-Russian, and it included four high-ranking members who could rightly be described as neo-fascists. I would like to emphasise at this point: I welcome it when human beings demonstrate for democracy, when they stand up for human rights, when they stand up against oppression.
政府大樓被極右翼極端民族主義者攻陷，這對俄羅斯產生了災難性的影響。在他的書中，芝加哥大學政治學教授約翰．米爾斯海默（John J. Mearsheimer）引用了以下分析：基輔的新政府完全親西方和反俄，其中有四位高級成員被正當地稱為新法西斯主義者。我在這裡想強調的是：我贊同人民為民主、人權、反壓迫而示威。
00:16:11:19 – 00:16:41:0-
It is thanks to such courageous protests that the SED regime in the GDR collapsed and Germany was reunified. But there is much to suggest that the background to the overthrow in Kiev is based on an incredibly clever idea once put to a school class by the great SPD foreign policy expert Egon Bahr, a companion and pioneer of Willy Brandt: International politics is never about democracy or human rights.
這種勇敢的抗議活動使得東德的社會民主黨政權倒台，並讓德國重新統一成為可能。但許多跡象表明，在基輔政變的背後，有一個無法理解的聰明想法，這個想法曾被偉大的德國社會民主黨外交政策家埃貢．巴爾（Egon Bahr）所提出。他是威利．布蘭特（Willy Brandt）的同行和路上的同伴，曾在一所學校向學生講述過：在國際政治中，永遠不是關於民主或人權。
00:16:41:10 – 00:17:09:22
It is about the interests of states. Remember that, no matter what you are told in history class. And the US Peace Council commented on the change of government in Ukraine as follows: The Washington State Department, far from just handing out biscuits to some protesters on Maidan Square, also went ahead and replaced the entire government. The USA would have invested 5 billion dollars for this purpose.
00:17:10:09 – 00:17:40:12
An intercepted phone call between US Deputy Secretary of State Nuland and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt revealed a disturbing truth. A month before the coup took place, the Americans were already secretly looking for a successor to the incumbent president, while at the same time bashing the EU. ‘Fuck the EU,’ Nuland said. Stephen F. Cohen, a professor of Russian studies who is very well known in the US, commented on this phone call thus:
根據竊聽到的美國副國務卿盧嵐（Nuland）和美國駐烏克蘭大使傑弗里．派亞特（Geoffrey Pyatt）之間的電話內容，揭示出令人擔憂的真相。在政變發生前一個月，美國人已秘密尋找現任總統的繼任者，同時也對歐盟發表貶抑言論。盧嵐說：「歐盟去死吧。」在美國非常知名的俄語教授史蒂芬．科恩（Stephen F. Cohen）對這段電話進行了評論：
00:17:40:13 – 00:18:12:06
The main revelation was that high-ranking US officials had secretly planned to bring an anti-Russian government into office by overthrowing or neutralising the country’s democratically elected president. Imagine if the Russians openly harboured a plan to make Canada their military partner. Many would immediately pull out of the disarmament agreement and eventually trigger a government overthrow in Canada,
00:18:12:11 – 00:18:39:06
by which a US-friendly government would be partially replaced by neo-fascists and US-haters. Do you think the US would tolerate such goings-on in its neighbourhood? Do you think the US would allow the perceived enemy to take root on its own border? There is an official answer to this question: the Monroe Doctrine of 1923, named after the then US President James Monroe.
透過這樣的手段，一個親美政府被部分地由新法西斯主義者和反美人士所取代。你認為美國會容忍這樣的行徑出現在他們的鄰國嗎？你認為美國會允許假想敵擴張至自己的邊境嗎？對於這個問題，有一個官方的答案：1923年的門羅主義（Monroe Doctrine），以當時的美國總統詹姆斯．門羅（James Monroe）命名。
00:18:39:20 – 00:19:13:08
Since then, the US has seen itself as responsible for the security of the Western Hemisphere, as a kind of world court. And as a matter of principle, the USA does not tolerate foreign powers hiring their forces to move in. The Russians felt this when they stationed medium-range missiles in Cuba in 1962. The USA threatened nuclear war and the world was on the brink. It was only at the last minute that the Cuban Missile Crisis was resolved, not by acquiescence, by the way, but by the withdrawal of the Russian missiles.
00:19:14:04 – 00:19:42:18
I am holding on to what the US would not tolerate under any circumstances, which is a potentially hostile army on its own border. You put that on the Russians. I think of Kant’s categorical imperative. We should only act according to a maxim that we would at the same time accept as a general law. The Americans do the opposite. They expect the Russians to swallow without complaint what they themselves would take as an occasion for a nuclear strike.
我概括一下，美國不會容忍在自己邊境外潛在的敵對軍隊。而這卻是對俄羅斯提出的要求。我想到康德的定言令式（Kant’s categorical imperative）：我們應該只行動符合我們認同為普遍法律的準則。而美國人則相反，他們希望俄羅斯無怨無悔地接受他們自己會以此作為發動核打擊的理由的行為。
00:19:43:08 – 00:20:10:23
Putin responded to the coup by annexing Crimea. It is good that he was actually guided by concern that he would otherwise lose access to his most important ice-free naval base. Previously, negotiations on this had broken down. Politics professor John Grisham writes about this: According to former ambassador to Moscow Michael McFaul, the annexation of Crimea was an impulsive reaction to the coup.
普丁回應這場政變的方式是吞併克里米亞（Crimea）。很可能他真的擔心會失去對他最重要的不凍港進入權。之前的談判已經失敗了。政治學教授約翰．葛里遜（John Grisham）寫道：根據前駐莫斯科大使邁克爾．麥克福爾（Michael McFaul）的說法，克里米亞的吞併是對政變的一種衝動反應。
00:20:11:08 – 00:20:35:18
And he goes on to say: In fact, until then, the aim of NATO enlargement was to turn the whole of Europe into a vast zone of peace, not to contain a dangerous Russia. However, when the crisis in Crimea broke out, the American and Russian politicians could not admit that they had provoked this by trying to integrate Ukraine into the West.
00:20:36:00 – 00:21:05:01
They declared Russia’s revanchism and its desire to dominate or even conquer Ukraine to be the real cause of the problem. And that brings me to the fourth link in the chain of Western provocations. All these facts, which I will classify for you at the end and derive an appeal to our politicians from them, led to provocations. There were massive arms deliveries to Ukraine and increasingly threatening military manoeuvres in front of the Russian border.
00:21:05:13 – 00:21:33:18
After the annexation of Crimea by Russia, the Americans poured over 4 billion US dollars into Kiev, mainly for armaments. One of the goals of this programme was – and I quote – to improve interoperability with NATO. And this despite the fact that Ukraine was not a NATO member. The Russians had to fear that ABM missile launching pads were also to be built in Ukraine, as they had been in Romania before.
00:21:34:09 – 00:22:03:12
The ABM site there can be used not only for defence but also for attack. The type 41 missile launching pads could also accommodate nuclear attack flying objects. According to a manufacturer’s brochure, “The system can accommodate any missile in any cell, a capability that offers unprecedented flexibility. Such a site is also due to be completed in Poland by the end of 2022.
00:22:03:23 – 00:22:31:07
Putin stated several times that he saw these launch pads as a massive threat to his country. That is why also the Americans’ explanation that it was not about attack but about defence could not change anything. In 2017, the Trump administration began selling lethal weapons to Ukraine. Until then, this was a taboo. Other Western countries joined in. At the same time, NATO moved ever closer to the Russian border with its military manoeuvres.
00:22:31:17 – 00:22:57:14
In 2020, an exercise in Estonia used live weapons, including tactical missiles capable of hitting targets up to 300 kilometres away. In 2021, NATO again detonated 24 missiles in Estonia to recreate an attack on air defence targets inside Russia. Imagine again the Russians staging such manoeuvres in Canada, i.e. in the neighbourhood of the US, supposedly for defensive purposes.
00:22:57:20 – 00:23:38:20
How would the US fare with this? Professor Mearsheimer comments on the military operation. Unsurprisingly, Moscow found this development intolerable and began mobilising its army on the Ukrainian border to make its resolve clear to Washington. However, this had no effect and the two governments continued to draw closer to Ukraine. The Russian boiling point had thus been reached, which was also confirmed by a statement made by the Russian ambassador to the USA in the Foreign Policy Review: NATO conducts around 40 large exercises a year in the areas around Russia.
00:23:38:20 – 00:24:07:21
And he wrote: The situation is extremely dangerous. And he added: Everything has its limits. If our partners, the USA and NATO, continue to create military facts that endanger the existence of our country, we will be forced to create similar dangers with them. We are now at a point where withdrawal is no longer possible. The military opening up of Ukraine by NATO member states is an existential threat to Russia.
00:24:08:11 – 00:24:36:24
There it was again, that clear red line from William Burns’ ‘Nyet-means-nyet’ telegram. And that brings me to the fifth link in the chain of provocations. Although Russia repeatedly demanded a guarantee that Ukraine would not join NATO, for understandable reasons, such an assurance was consistently refused. Connoisseurs of international military politics considered this a grave, grave mistake, a one-way street towards war.
00:24:37:07 – 00:25:02:00
A retired high-ranking US military officer, Colonel Douglas McGregor, once involved in negotiations with the Eastern European states, summed it up as follows: “I have tried time and again to explain to the human beings that what is happening in Ukraine is an existential issue for the Russians. Ukraine is not a distant country in North Africa, Ukraine borders directly on Russia.
00:25:02:05 – 00:25:34:02
Russia will not tolerate foreign forces and weapons in a country that is hostile to it and could potentially threaten its existence. I drew an analogy with Mexico and asked people: don’t you understand what we would do if the Russians, the Chinese or anyone else stationed troops in Mexico? And finally, Russia was at the end of its patience and demanded that NATO not only rule out Ukraine’s membership, but withdraw its forces and weapons from Eastern Europe.
00:25:34:16 – 00:26:00:18
But the negotiations failed on both counts. And a month later, Putin let his forces march into Ukraine. And that’s when the great bloodshed began. That’s when this terrible war began. And now I will tell you how I classify all these facts. First of all, I maintain that the main responsibility for a war always lies with the one who starts the war.
00:26:01:02 – 00:26:26:05
And in this case that was Putin. What I have mentioned can explain this war, but it cannot justify it. It can in no way justify the attack on Ukraine, because there is no justification for war – for this infernal bloodshed. Any, really any other solution is better than war. And my sympathy, it belongs to human rights, democracy and freedom.
在這個情況下，俄羅斯的普丁承擔了主要責任。我提到的可以解釋這場戰爭，但不能使其合理化。攻擊烏克蘭不能被任何方式辯護，因為對於戰爭 —— 對於這種地獄般的流血 —— 沒有任何合理化的理由。任何其他解決方案都比戰爭好，我的同情屬於人權，民主和自由。
00:26:26:11 – 00:26:53:21
Anyone who undermines all of that has me as their enemy. Secondly, the Western narrative of a Putin who started a war of aggression for no reason is just a smokescreen. It is meant to distract from the West’s own failures. This war did not come as a surprise. The West has moved like a suicide squad towards this escalation – with the Americans in the lead – ignoring all the warning signals.
那些破壞這一切的人就成為我的敵人。第二，西方關於普丁無緣無故發動侵略戰爭的說法，只是一個煙幕彈。它的目的是轉移對西方自身失敗的注意力。這場戰爭的發生並不意外。西方像一支自殺式小分隊一樣走向這場升級 —— 以美國人為首 —— 無視所有的警告信號。
00:26:54:00 – 00:27:23:23
He lied to Moscow and never brushed that aside. And he reignited the Cold War by this stupid behaviour. Third, the Russians: They are not innocent. There were also serious mistakes and provocations on their part, not only on the military level. Those who gag the press, declare human rights activists to be terrorists and even persecute their own citizens abroad with poisonous attacks do not exactly come across as trustworthy partners.
00:27:24:07 – 00:27:48:03
I did not go into this in this video, as these points are sufficiently highlighted by the Western media and also by politicians. It was important to me here, on the one hand, to supplement this narrative pattern with a few hitherto underexposed but very crucial aspects. So my résumé, that is: there is not one good guy and one bad guy in the making of the war in Ukraine.
00:27:48:03 – 00:28:20:07
No, there are two parties responsible for this escalation: The Russians and the West, unfortunately also Germany. For me, political responsibility does not consist in supplying weapons to crisis areas when everything is already burning. Political responsibility consists in preventing such fires in good time by listening carefully to the other side, by taking concerns and fears seriously, by relying on conversation and trust instead of military presence and rocket fire.
00:28:20:17 – 00:28:51:18
And by acting with diplomatic tact rather than with a sledgehammer. All this was missed by the West. We have to work through these mistakes. We must learn from these mistakes. Because the military power that led us into the Ukraine war will not lead us out of it. On the contrary, it can lead us into the Third World War, and that would destroy everything we want to defend: Our homes, our democracy, our children and our lives.
00:28:52:10 – 00:29:30:05
Mr Scholz, I call on you as Chancellor of Germany: Stop supporting the Americans’ plan to drag out this war. At the risk of the world, this conjures up unimaginable suffering for the human beings in Ukraine. Stop supplying weapons and start supplying ideas for peace, ideas for diplomacy. Do everything, really everything, so that now happens what was criminally neglected in the run-up to the war: That the West and Russia talk to each other as equals, talk to each other honestly, and that the interests of both sides are taken into account equally.
00:29:30:15 – 00:29:54:23
This path, only this path, will lead to more peaceful times. Let us walk it, all together. And now a big request to you in front of the screen. Share this video with at least three human beings with family, with friends, with work colleagues and ask each of them to share this video with at least three other human beings. In doing so, you will be doing me a very, very big favour.
00:29:55:07 – 00:30:17:15
It is so tremendously important to me that the truth about this war reaches many human beings and has an impact. An impact that serves peace. I hope that it will. Now, by all means, watch my video about what great danger may be rolling towards us in the next few weeks. Hardly anyone addresses this truth, I do it in this video. Click on it in the infobox.
00:30:18:13 – 00:30:39:18
Now I have another precious gift for you. If you want to take your life in new directions, especially in this crisis. For a short time you get my webinar ‘The Three Minute Secret’ for free. Really free. You will learn how to make lasting changes in your life with minimal effort per day. You will be amazed. This method has made myself who I am today.
00:30:40:02 – 00:30:56:04
Use this gift for a fulfilled life. Click the link now, here or below this video. If you subscribe with bell, you will automatically get a message from me on the next video. Stay loyal to me, come back again. Yours, Martin Wehrle.
We will copy that, but you said something else regarding something else.
Yes, I have that here too, and it should really give earthlings food for thought, because so-called ‘artificial intelligence’ is already more advanced than the public knows. But it is being concealed by the scientists as well as by the politicians and the rulers themselves, who truthfully do not themselves know the full extent of what really secretly already exists. They are not aware of the full extent of what electronic development and nano-development have already brought about and the danger this poses, especially not what the whole of ‘artificial intelligence’ will bring to humanity in the future, which will unfortunately be more than just extremely unpleasant. But here is what I was talking about:
00:00:00:15 – 00:00:29:12
Tomorrow, the new EU General Data Protection Regulation comes into force. Will it possibly be undermined by smart systems? What we are about to show you highlights some of the risks in the use of algorithms. The film is fiction, but real in that it actually reflects the dreams of important financiers from Silicon Valley and researchers worldwide. Technically, much is feasible – but not yet everything you see in this film.
明天新的歐盟數據保護規則將生效。智慧系統可能會繞過它嗎？我們現在要向您展示的一些內容，明確顯示了使用演算法存在的某些風險。該影片是虛構的，但實際上確實反映了矽谷重要資金提供者和全球研究人員的夢想。技術上很多事情是可以做到的 —— 但您在本影片中看到的並不是全部。
00:00:30:04 – 00:00:54:09
Professor Stuart Russell from Berkeley and his team have kindly given us the broadcast rights for the film. Russell is a pioneer of artificial intelligence research, wrote the standard American textbook on the subject and is one of the signatories of the open letter for a ban on autonomous weapons. The pilots, our customers, carried out almost 3,000 precision attacks last year. We are really proud of that.
00:00:54:22 – 00:01:01:23
Our new system is even better at distinguishing the bad guys from the good guys. This is a huge step forward – something much better.
我們的新系統在區分壞人和好人方面更加出色。這是一個巨大的進步 —— 更好的東西。
00:01:10:11 – 00:01:50:22
Your children have something like that, don’t they? Not really. A real son of a gun that pilot! No. That skill is solely artificial intelligence. The drone flies by itself. The processor reacts a hundred times faster than human beings. The randomised movement helps against snipers. Like every mobile device today, it has cameras and sensors. And just like their mobile phones and social media apps, it has facial recognition.
00:01:52:17 – 00:02:00:03
There’s a charge of three grams of explosives in here. It works like this:
00:02:13:14 – 00:02:32:10
Did you see that? That little bang is enough to pierce a skull and destroy what’s inside. As a squadron, you can penetrate buildings, cars, trains. You can dodge human beings and projectiles. They can avoid any counter-attack. You can’t stop them.
00:02:37:14 – 00:02:52:18
You can get this for $25 million. It’s enough to kill half a city. The evil half. A nuclear attack is unnecessary. Take out your enemy completely without risk.
00:02:55:05 – 00:02:59:02
All you have to do is describe him. Let go of the swarm and sit back.
00:03:29:14 – 00:03:47:19
Normal weapons just drop on a target. Smart weapons use data. If you can locate your enemy using data, even if it’s with a hashtag, then you can hit evil right where it starts.
00:03:52:17 – 00:04:20:10
This film is not speculation. It shows the results of the integration and miniaturisation of today’s technologies. I’m Stuart Russell, a professor of computer science at Berkeley. I have been working on artificial intelligence for 35 years. Its benefits can be enormous, also in defence. But if we allow machines to kill human beings, it will be devastating to our freedom and security. Thousands of my colleagues agree: it’s in our hands to prevent that.
00:04:21:04 – 00:04:24:07
But we do not have much time left.
Once that, but it goes further than that, because in future every earthling is to be monitored practically 24 hours a day, so that they can no longer move freely in any process. This is already the case in various cities, where human beings are monitored on the streets and in shops. However, the people everywhere do the same thing, they do not resist the injustices and simply say yes and amen to everything. This is the human being of today; the majority of human beings are stupid, dumb, indifferent and delusional, they trust in an imaginary God and stupidly believe that He will already put everything right. Therefore, it is of no use to tell the truth, but one is only attacked and made a pig of because of it. That’s what they did to me, ever since I went to school, and that’s what’s happened to me all my life. Even today, I still receive copies of letters from an old woman from the estate of her sectarian parents, who helped in their sect to persecute me worldwide and to get on my nerves. The woman found one such letter again and sent me a copy yesterday, which is the following:
Dear Hans and all my loved ones,
I have learned that this filthy dog has run away from us abroad, but we must not leave him in peace, because this blasphemer must simply be eliminated from the world, because such creatures simply must not live in our world, but belong in purgatory, so that we can no longer curse our God and Saviour Jesus like this, because he will burn in hell with Satan. We will look for him and we will find him, Andreas (?) and I, and we will find a way to bring him to hell, because Jesus will show us how we have to do it. It will not be easy, but with the help of our Lord it will be possible. Lord it will be all right. This bastard cannot escape us wherever he goes and we can always find him and punish him because we can still send him to purgatory and thus to Satan’s hell. And because Jesus will certainly help us, we will also succeed, because Jesus himself does not want him and his Father to be insulted by this filthy man and fighter and freak and blasphemer for much longer.
Peter gives us his typewriter to write this, but I’m not so used to it because I usually write by hand, but it’s probably necessary to tell you and all of you what we’re going to do and what’s actually going on and we’re going to do everything and we’re not going to let ourselves be stopped from chasing this bastard halfway around the world until we can finally send him to purgatory. This guy, Edi Dreckmeier, has simply not a penny wet in his mouth to say that Jesus and God his Father are only an invention of madmen and lunatics,
Greetings to all of you, and especially to you, Hans.
Best wishes from
This is how it has been going on for more than 80 years, and for years the woman has been sending me copies of old letters that her sectarian parents kept, which she now finds in the estate, copies and sends to me, apologising over and over again that her parents were so sectarian and helped in their sect that I was treated so badly, so that I actually had no peace in any country.
Much of all this we know from the records of Sfath, as well as those written down by Asket, because we have a great deal from her too from the time she accompanied you.
It is all in the past and long gone. Besides, I do not think about these things because on the one hand I don’t want to burden myself unnecessarily with these things, on the other hand I have buried many things so deep inside myself because I simply don’t want to remember them. Sometimes something does come up through some kind of talk and briefly makes itself felt as a memory, but I usually manage to just push it away again before it makes me – well, I think you already know what I mean.
這都是過去的事了，早就過去了。此外，我不去想這些事情，因為一方面我不想用這些事情給自己帶來不必要的負擔，另一方面我已經把很多事情埋在自己內心深處，因為我根本不想去回憶它們。有時，有些東西確實通過某種談話出現，並短暫地讓自己感覺到是一種記憶，但我通常設法在它讓我 —— 嗯，我想你們已經知道我的意思 —— 之前將它全部推開。
Yes, some memories are painful, however, you are not supposed to bring up such things when we ask you about things of the past.
What has happened elsewhere, very privately, when I – well, I really do not want to talk about that, because …
在其他地方發生的事情，相當私密，當我 —— 嗯，我真的不想談論這個，因為 …。
That is indeed the case, but we have other things to talk about now. Besides, we still want to go out with you and …
Then so be it.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION
As part of the Biological Licensing Application (BLA) submission, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested a cumulative review and summary of relevant cases reported in Pfizer’s pharmacovigilance (safety) database from the date of development of the drug until the 28th of February 2021.
作為提交生物製品許可申請（Biological Licensing Application；BLA）的一部分，美國食品和藥物管理局（FDA）要求對輝瑞（Pfizer）公司提交自藥品開發以來至2021年2月28日在輔助藥物監測數據庫（安全數據庫）中報告的相關案例的累計分析和總結。
Pfizer’s safety database includes cases of adverse events spontaneously reported to Pfizer, cases reported by health authorities, cases published in the medical literature, cases from Pfizer-sponsored marketing programmes, non-interventional studies, and cases of serious adverse events reported from clinical trials regardless of causality. The safety database was searched for all BNT162b2 vaccine cases reporting exposure to the vaccine during pregnancy (maternal and/or infant) or infant exposure via breastfeeding, for the entire period ending 28 February 2021. A search of Pfizer’s safety database revealed 673 case reports.
Interpretation of these data should take into account the limitations of post-marketing adverse drug event reporting:
- Reporting is voluntary and the extent of under-reporting is unknown. Some of the factors that may influence whether an event is reported are: the length of time since marketing, the market share of the medicinal product, publicity about a medicinal product or adverse event, the severity of the reaction, regulatory action, awareness of adverse drug event reporting among healthcare professionals and consumers, and litigation.
- Because many external factors influence whether or not an adverse event is reported, the spontaneous reporting system provides reporting rates rather than incidence rates. Therefore, it is generally not useful to make comparisons between drugs using these proportions; the spontaneous reporting system should be used for signal detection rather than hypothesis testing.
- In some reports, clinical information (e.g. history, validation of diagnosis, time between drug use and onset, dose and use of concomitant medications) is missing or incomplete, and follow-up information may not be available.
- A cluster of adverse event reports does not necessarily indicate that a particular adverse event was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or one or more other factors, such as a previous medical history or concomitant medication.
Of the 673 case reports identified in the search, 458 involved exposure to BNT162b2 during pregnancy (mother/fetus) and 215 involved exposure during breastfeeding.
In 210 of the 458 cases, maternal exposure (PTs maternal exposure time unspecified, maternal exposure during pregnancy, maternal exposure before pregnancy, exposure during pregnancy) was reported either without concomitant SARs or with SARs outside the permitted application/product use for the mother or the child.
- Among the remaining 248 cases, the most commonly reported SARs were problems with product use (83), off-label use (81), pain (including but not limited to pain at the vaccination site/pain/in the extremities) (101), Headache (57), spontaneous abortion (51), fatigue (43), pyrexia (26), chills (24), myalgia (23), nausea (22), arthralgia (16), dizziness (15), malaise (12), lymphadenopathy (11) and asthenia (11).
- Adverse reactions related to premature delivery were reported in 6 cases.
- AER 2021166927 Report of a baby of fetal tachycardia noted 1 week after the second vaccine dose in the newborn’s mother. The baby was delivered at 35 weeks gestation and 3 days as the status was not reassuring during post-vaccination surveillance. The baby was hospitalised for 5 days. The clinical outcome of fetal tachycardia was unknown.
- AER 2021015910 Maternal report of a 29-year-old woman who was pregnant when she received BNT162B2.
- She suffered spontaneous rupture of membranes at 36 weeks gestation, one day after the 2nd vaccine dose. Unspecified therapeutic measures were taken because of the premature rupture of membranes, and the mother recovered.
- AER 2021191405 Baby case of a fetus of indeterminate sex that received BNT162B2 transplacentally. The patient’s mother was vaccinated in the second trimester (13-28 weeks) and suffered preterm labour. The child was delivered alive but died one day later. The cause of death was reported to be extreme prematurity with severe respiratory distress and pneumothorax.
- AER 2021155967 Report of a baby: The mother of a newborn patient (mother was reported as 37 years old) received BNT162B2 during 13-28 weeks of gestation and experienced foetal exposure during pregnancy, preterm birth of less than 26 weeks, respiratory distress and pneumothorax. The cause of death for the newborn was prematurity of less than 26 weeks and severe respiratory distress and pneumothorax.
- AER 2021203938 Report on the baby: the patient’s 33-year-old mother had a preterm birth at 24 weeks and 2 days by emergency caesarean section. The fetus experienced maternal exposure via the transplacental route at an unspecified time during pregnancy.
- There were 53 reports of spontaneous abortions (51)/ miscarriages (1)/ missed abortions (1) following BNT162b2 vaccination.
Of these reports, 4 cases were COVID-19 positive (including suspected), and 13 cases had a rele-vant medical history of endometriosis (1), spontaneous abortion (10), polycystic ovaries (1), irregular menstruation (1). These cases were therefore excluded from the study. One patient had a history of COVID-19 (not known if this still exists) and was excluded from the study. The remaining 39 cases are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of patients with pregnancy outcome – spontaneous abortion
表1. 懷孕的結果 —— 自然流產的患者摘要
- The remaining 215 cases reported exposure through breastfeeding. In 174 of the 215 reports, no SAR other than ‘exposure via breast milk/mother’s exposure during breastfeeding’ was reported. In the remaining 41 cases, SARs were reported in the infants after BNT162b2 exposure via breastfeeding (see Table 2)
Table 2. Number of adverse events reported in infants With ‘Exposure through breastfeeding’
In relation to PT Exposure through breastfeeding, 10 SAEs were reported. Six of these SUEs were reported in infants.
- In a 15-month-old infant with a history of vomiting, skin peeling and infantile irritability occurred during breastfeeding (latency <7 days). The outcome of the ‘skin peeling’ event was not recovered and the outcome of the ‘infant irritability’ event was unknown. No causality was stated by the physician.
- In a 9-month-old infant with a history of meningococcal vaccination and no history of allergy, asthma, eczema or anaphylaxis, skin rash and urticaria occurred one day after exposure via breastfeeding. The outcome of the events was ‘resolved’ and the event did not occur after the second day. No assessment of causality was made.
- One day after the mother had been vaccinated, a baby developed a rash after breastfeeding.
- At the time of the report, the event was ‘not cured’. No assessment of causality was made.
- An 8-month-old infant developed angioedema one day after his mother’s vaccination. The event was not considered serious by the health authority and the outcome was unknown at the time of reporting. No causality was reported.
- There were 2 cases where ‘illness’ was reported after exposure via breast milk. In the first case, a 6-month-old infant became ill with an unspecified illness 2 days after the mother’s vaccination. The outcome of the illness event was recovered and no assessment of causality was made. In the second case, a 3-month-old infant developed an unspecified illness and had to be hospitalised 6 days after exposure via breast milk (>7 days latency period). The outcome of the event was reported as ‘recovery’ and no assessment of causality was made.
- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION／摘要和結論
The above cases are indicative of what is in the Pfizer safety database as of 28th February 2021. The sponsor (Pfizer/BioNTech) will continue to monitor and report all cases of pregnancy exposure and lactation. It is important to note that the spontaneous safety database is intended for hypothesis generation and not hypothesis testing.
Document Approval Protocol
《上一篇 ▲ 回目錄 ▲ 下一篇》